The day-to-day reality of enforcing immigration laws
Arthur Hunter • April 22, 2012

This week the Supreme Court is to hear argument in Arizona v. United States, the case that may determine the constitutionality of that state's 2010 law regarding illegal immigrants. Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana and Utah have passed similar laws authorizing police officers to detain and question people about their immigration status.


While presiding over a criminal case a few years ago — a prosecution for operating an automobile without documentation of lawful presence in the United States — I asked the arresting officer what, exactly, caused him to suspect that the defendant was not a legal U.S. resident. “Because,” the officer said, Louisiana’s immigration statute passed in 2002 “relates to someone in the country illegally.”


I posed my question a different way: “Well, how would you know, again, that a white driver, a black driver, Asian driver, Indian driver, someone from the Middle East, are illegal aliens for you to even ask that question?”


He responded, “I don’t know, I guess.”


I pressed further: “Well, what makes you ask a Latino driver whether or not he is an illegal alien?”


The officer’s reply was revealing: “Nothing. I don’t have an answer for that.”

While many have debated the constitutionality of these laws, our public discourse lacks a clear expression of the practical implications such statutes have on criminal cases. I am a criminal court judge in Louisiana and a former police officer. I have seen firsthand the onerous burden placed on law enforcement and the judiciary when statutes like those enacted in Arizona and Louisiana criminalize a person's inability to establish his or her immigration status upon demand. These statutes give law enforcement officials unlimited discretion that is prone to abuse by officers intent on detaining undocumented immigrants.


So far, all states with such laws have included admonitions against racial or ethnic profiling. But my experience as a trial court judge has convinced me that cautionary “no-profiling” provisions are inherently ineffective. They are unenforceable because they are vague and give too much discretion to police officers on the street.


Consider that the immigration statutes passed in all of these states prohibit racial profiling as a means of enforcement, yet all are silent as to how law enforcement should determine who is an illegal alien.


How can the mere inclusion of statutory provisions prohibiting racial profiling prevent the practice? Is there any means by which law enforcement agencies can develop objective policies that do not rely on skin color, national origin, or other racially or ethnically subjective factors to trigger an inquiry into whether a person is an illegal immigrant? People of all colors and nationalities live in our country, and these factors alone surely are insufficient under the Constitution to prompt law enforcement interrogations into one’s immigration status.


On the other hand, a neutral, broad policy that encourages police officers to ask everyone to “show your papers,” even in the course of an otherwise routine traffic stop, could turn our communities into something akin to police states.


When prosecutors pursue charges brought under these laws, it falls to the judges presiding in state courts to determine whether racial profiling has occurred. But the courts have not been provided standards or procedural mechanisms by which they can root out abuses by law enforcement. The absence of effective standards to identify police violations of provisions barring racial profiling renders the provisions unworkable and unenforceable by courts. And arguably, these statutes may require racial profiling to be enforced because it is simply impracticable for law enforcement officers to require every person they encounter to prove citizenship.


For any law to be effective, there must be viable, constitutional means by which it can be enforced. The criminal penalties created by anti-immigration laws such as Arizona’s make proper enforcement standards all the more imperative. As the Supreme Court considers the constitutional questions raised in the Arizona case, the justices should not overlook the realities of day-to-day administration of criminal justice in U.S. trial courts.

ARTHUR HUNTER IN THE NEWS

In Bourbon Street security zone for Super Bowl, coolers are out but guns are OK
By John Simerman and Jeff Adelson | NOLA.com January 31, 2025
As crowds descend on Bourbon Street in the run-up to the Super Bowl, they'll be met by a layer of checkpoints aimed at enforcing new restrictions that state officials say will keep the crowds safe. But the new ring of defenses won’t keep out one of the deadliest weapons in America: the firearm.
Ensuring we all feel safe and are stably employed
By Arthur Hunter January 15, 2025
Ever since the 9/11 terrorist attacks that took down the World Trade towers in New York, cities been more aware that these tragedies can happen anywhere. In particular, the city of New Orleans as been declared a soft target for a terrorist attack, partly because of the large crowds that gather here, on our streets.
Being a New Orleans Police officer is a tough job!
By Arthur Hunter January 3, 2025
As a former New Orleans Police Department officer, I can tell you from first-hand experience that being a New Orleans Police officer is a tough job. You will be placed in dangerous situations and have to make split decisions to protect people, even if it means disregarding your own safety.
By Arthur Hunter October 8, 2024
On Saturday afternoon, I sat down for two-and-a-half hours with a group of young African American men, between the ages of 18 and 22, hearing what they think about our city.
By Arthur Hunter August 5, 2024
Have you ever wondered who profits from those extra fees when you pay your property tax online? Or your Sewerage & Water Board bill? Or those annoying traffic camera tickets? It’s not the City. But it can be. We’re likely talking about millions of dollars that we can use to build the city we deserve at no extra cost to our citizens.
By Arthur Hunter July 3, 2024
When I was a New Orleans police officer, the legislature often changed laws and we as a police force had to adapt. Otherwise, any arrests or charges would be ruled illegal, something I also decided as a criminal court judge.
By Arthur Hunter May 28, 2024
If we bring the right people to the table and think outside the box, we can reduce insurance rates, bring down heat levels within our city, put our youth to work, have strong roofs, dry streets, cooler neighborhoods and be a national leader in climate adaptation.
The recent shootings at Wit’s Inn and Republic NOLA were tragic for the families and our city.
By Arthur Hunter April 18, 2024
I grew up in New Orleans East. My family moved to the East in the 1960s when it was known as Gentilly East. We lived in a double at 4930 Rhodes Drive (built by Horace Bynum Sr.) on the same street where the Rhodes family (Funeral Home owners) lived and a street over (Rosemont Place), from where CORE Leader Don Hubbard lived. We all lived on that part of Chef Menteur Highway known as the GAP. I attended elementary school at Jefferson Davis, (presently Kipp Morial), Livingston Middle School and Abramson Senior High School (9th grade). I played NORD football, basketball, baseball at Pradat Park and met friends from the Blue Goose, Academy Park and Flake Avenue. I lived in the East while I finished St. Aug, Loyola University, Loyola University School of Law, and while I worked as a NOPD police officer and began my practice as an attorney. Although I do not presently live in the East, I still have family, friends living, working, owning businesses in the East and I attend the Franklin Avenue Baptist Church. The East, and its people have nurtured and inspired my career of public service over more than four decades. So when I talk to people about the East, I remember how it was and what it can become. The potential for development in the East is as great now, as it was in 1970, but the first thing we must do is make it safe. There are a few things we can do: Request the State Police actively patrol I-10, I-510, and Chef Menteur Highway 24/7/365. Assign NOPD Traffic Division and Special Operations officers in unmarked cars patrol Crowder, Read, Bullard, Michoud and on a rotating basis Downman, Morrison, Hayne, Lake Forest, Dwyer, Gentilly and Almonaster. Assign community policing to hot spots in the Seventh District. Revitalize Joe Brown Park to be a regional sports destination and assign year round supervisors to playgrounds focusing on sports, art, music, technology and STEM. Work with the Orleans Parish School Board to establish early childhood learning and summer camps in the neighborhood schools. Build a City Hall Annex to include state/federal offices with free covered parking on the Lake Forest Plaza site. Expand the New Orleans East Hospital to become a centerpiece for prenatal care services, diabetes prevention, establish a nursing school and a pipeline with the high schools, universities/colleges and medical schools to increase the number of African Americans entering the medical professions. Develop Lake Pontchartrain from the South Shore to Lincoln Beach. Work with Delgado Community College and NASA to teach skill trades and technology in the high schools. Build the necessary infrastructure to attract investment to the Almonaster Corridor. Plan and build resilient infrastructure for equitable and environmental sustainability.(Disaster preparedness, water and flood management, sustainable energy) If we do these things, without playing the political games of “who you know” rather than “what you know”, then the East can be what it was meant to be-a place to be safe, raise and educate our children and enjoy the quality of living.
Show More